Author: Yamileth Medinabr
Source: articlesbase.combr
br
A sad story in Miami, Florida regarding health insurance was recently brought to my attention. It highlights the flaws inherent in both public and private health insurance plans, and is an example of why healthcare reform is so important. A friend of mine has an ailing grandfather, named Benito Jimenez. Benitos daughter, Maria Conroy cares for him 24/7, and has taken charge of navigating the complexities of his insurance coverage. Her 85-year-old father has Medicare, but also has a Medicare Advantage administered by Humana. This would seem like an ideal compromise of the government and corporations, which would allow them to provide the best healthcare possible. Instead, its only brought Maria and her family one frustration after another. Benito suffers from various conditions, but his health recently took a turn for the worse. He has developed anemia, which decreases the amount of healthy red blood cells. Severe anemia prevents your body from pumping oxygen everywhere its needed, so its obviously an urgent concern, especially for senior citizens. His doctors arent sure where his internal bleeding is coming from, though Maria suspects that its related to a previous stomach ulcer that was caused due to Benito taking a large combination of medications daily. The recommended test is an endoscopy, generally considered a simple and safe procedure (as opposed to a colonoscopy, which is more invasive). Unfortunately, possibly due to Benitos age, his gastroenterologist–part of his primary care doctors team–refuses to perform it himself, despite being able and certified to do so–Maria feels that he is most likely scared of a malpractice lawsuit. Maria begged him to allow her to sign a waiver removing his liability, but he refused to take the risk of doing it on an outpatient basis. That gastroenterologist further explained that he would be obligated to do any and all tests necessary to save Benitos life if he was in a hospital setting. After the gastroenterologist told them to go to the hospital (where the procedure would be performed at a higher cost to them, as well as their health insurance), Maria and Benito were kicked back to their primary care physician. Despite Benitos hemoglobin level being a very low 8.5, they were told that he wouldnt be referred to a hospital until his hemoglobin level was 7. She is unclear as to whether the doctor or the insurance company establishes this arbitrary rule. If they had investigated his medical history, a hemoglobin level of 8 had previously sent Benito to the hospital in need of a blood transfusion. In the infinite wisdom of Medicare and Humanas reimbursement rules, they would not offer preventative treatment until he was in critical condition and needed even more medical care. This runaround was costly for Maria, both financially and emotionally. Benito was prescribed an increasing number of medications to mask his symptoms, but they produced other side effects and exacerbated his main problem (while also resulting in higher co-pays). She felt that the doctors were condescending and were more focused on preventing health insurance fraud than providing care. While Medicare fraud is relatively common, the preventative measures may have backfired. Honest, ethical patients and their loved ones dont receive the care they need, because they are unaware of the loopholes. For example, a previous cardiologist of Benitos once referred him to Baptist Hospital in Miami, in order for another specialist to examine him; however, his insurance company wouldnt pay for a visit to that particular hospital. The cardiologist suggested that he pretend to faint somewhere in close physical proximity to the hospital or in the hospital lobby, so they would be forced to admit him and later discover what he actually needed. This suggestion shocked and dismayed Maria. For too many doctors, the health insurance bureaucracy has changed their caring vocation into an impersonal business. Ideally, healthcare reform would change this, eventhough this story shows an negative example of government involvement in health insurance. The saddest part of Marias story is that Benito was present when a cardiologist his primary care doctor urged him to consult with shockingly informed Maria, as if he wasnt capable of understanding or wasnt listening, that further investigation would be pointless due to his frail condition–or at least, not enough of a sure thing to avoid the risk of lawsuits. They indirectly, but essentially told her, in front of him, that he should go home, medicate the symptoms and wait to die. Again, their fear of malpractice judgments and desire to bill Humana and the federal government (thereby making up for decreased funding that cut reimbursement rates) for as many procedures as possible overtook their oath to do no harm. It seems as though they prefer to wait until someone is in critical condition to provide preventative care, which results in their needing even more medical care. Meanwhile, Benitos condition was far from terminal. A previous gastroenterologist agreed to perform an outpatient procedure, but his insurance was only willing to cover the specialist recommended by his primary care doctor. As opposed to working together for the benefit of the patient, that doctor steered them to the uncooperative gastroenterologist described above. Since the outcome was unsuccessful, Maria eventually managed to get her fathers initial gastroenterologist covered under his health insurance plan; however, the delay was detrimental to his care. Benitos anemia is now critical: this lessens the chances of success of an outpatient endoscopy and might mean that hell need a hospital stay, after all. In Marias own words, the health insurance industry has enacted its own cash for clunkers program. Only in this case, the so-called clunkers are older Americans being sent to the junkyard. Theres a lot of fault to go around: Medicare stretches its budget to the limit and has bureaucrats making coverage decisions, while for-profit insurers like Humana have CEOs and shareholders that also demand a reduction in costs. The patients themselves–our parents, grandparents, siblings, children, partners, and friends–are lost in the midst this battle, even though they should be the most important factor of all. Some opponents of the public option claim that it will lead to the forced euthanasia of seniors, while others believe those claims are overblown. Nevertheless, indirect euthanasia is already happening right now; this is a case in point. Healthcare reform is a complicated issue, and its deeper than greater availability of affordable health insurance. That wont matter if, after paying premiums and/or taxes for decades, your insurance wont give you the care you need most. I dont claim to know what proposal will work best, but Maria says that the current system is broken and that we urgently need healthcare reform of some kind. Everybody doesnt have a family member to be an advocate, she adds. I worry about how many elderly people fall through the cracks without someone to find the loopholes work the system for them.br
br
pYamileth Medina is an up and coming expert on a rel=nofollow,nofollow href=http://www.vitalonehealth.comHealth Insurance/a and a rel=nofollow,nofollow href=http://www.healthinsurancesearch.com/healthcare-reform/Healthcare Reform/a. She aims to help people realize that they can get affordable a rel=nofollow,nofollow href=http://www.vitalonehealth.comaffordable health insurance/a right now while waiting for a public option, if it ever gets passed. Yamileth lives in Miami, FL./pbr
br

Author: Yamileth Medinabr
Source: ezinearticles.combr
br
A sad story in Miami, Florida regarding health insurance was recently brought to my attention. It highlights the flaws inherent in both public and private health insurance plans, and is an example of why healthcare reform is so important. A friend of mine has an ailing grandfather, named Benito Jimenez. Benitos daughter, Maria Conroy cares for him 24/7, and has taken charge of navigating the complexities of his insurance coverage. Her 85-year-old father has Medicare, but also has a Medicare Advantage administered by Humana. This would seem like an ideal compromise of the government and corporations, which would allow them to provide the best healthcare possible. Instead, its only brought Maria and her family one frustration after another.

Benito suffers from various conditions, but his health recently took a turn for the worse. He has developed anemia, which decreases the amount of healthy red blood cells. Severe anemia prevents your body from pumping oxygen everywhere its needed, so its obviously an urgent concern, especially for senior citizens. His doctors arent sure where his internal bleeding is coming from, though Maria suspects that its related to a previous stomach ulcer that was caused due to Benito taking a large combination of medications daily. The recommended test is an endoscopy, generally considered a simple and safe procedure (as opposed to a colonoscopy, which is more invasive). Unfortunately, possibly due to Benitos age, his gastroenterologist–part of his primary care doctors team–refuses to perform it himself, despite being able and certified to do so–Maria feels that he is most likely scared of a malpractice lawsuit. Maria begged him to allow her to sign a waiver removing his liability, but he refused to take the risk of doing it on an outpatient basis. That gastroenterologist further explained that he would be obligated to do any and all tests necessary to save Benitos life if he was in a hospital setting.

After the gastroenterologist told them to go to the hospital (where the procedure would be performed at a higher cost to them, as well as their health insurance), Maria and Benito were kicked back to their primary care physician. Despite Benitos hemoglobin level being a very low 8.5, they were told that he wouldnt be referred to a hospital until his hemoglobin level was 7. She is unclear as to whether the doctor or the insurance company establishes this arbitrary rule. If they had investigated his medical history, a hemoglobin level of 8 had previously sent Benito to the hospital in need of a blood transfusion. In the infinite wisdom of Medicare and Humanas reimbursement rules, they would not offer preventative treatment until he was in critical condition and needed even more medical care. This runaround was costly for Maria, both financially and emotionally. Benito was prescribed an increasing number of medications to mask his symptoms, but they produced other side effects and exacerbated his main problem (while also resulting in higher co-pays). She felt that the doctors were condescending and were more focused on preventing health insurance fraud than providing care. While Medicare fraud is relatively common, the preventative measures may have backfired. Honest, ethical patients and their loved ones dont receive the care they need, because they are unaware of the loopholes. For example, a previous cardiologist of Benitos once referred him to Baptist Hospital in Miami, in order for another specialist to examine him; however, his insurance company wouldnt pay for a visit to that particular hospital. The cardiologist suggested that he pretend to faint somewhere in close physical proximity to the hospital or in the hospital lobby, so they would be forced to admit him and later discover what he actually needed. This suggestion shocked and dismayed Maria.

For too many doctors, the health insurance bureaucracy has changed their caring vocation into an impersonal business. Ideally, healthcare reform would change this, even though this story shows an negative example of government involvement in health insurance. The saddest part of Marias story is that Benito was present when his primary care doctor shockingly informed Maria, as if he wasnt capable of understanding or wasnt listening, that further investigation would be pointless due to his frail condition–or at least, not enough of a sure thing to avoid the risk of lawsuits. They indirectly, but essentially told her, in front of him, that he should go home, medicate the symptoms and wait to die. Again, their fear of malpractice judgments and desire to bill Humana and the federal government (thereby making up for decreased funding that cut reimbursement rates) for as many procedures as possible overtook their oath to do no harm. It seems as though they prefer to wait until someone is in critical condition to provide preventative care, which results in their needing even more medical care. Meanwhile, Benitos condition was far from terminal. A previous gastroenterologist agreed to perform an outpatient procedure, but his insurance was only willing to cover the specialist recommended by his primary care doctor. As opposed to working together for the benefit of the patient, that doctor steered them to the uncooperative gastroenterologist described above. Since the outcome was unsuccessful, Maria eventually managed to get her fathers initial gastroenterologist covered under his health insurance plan; however, the delay was detrimental to his care. Benitos anemia is now critical: this lessens the chances of success of an outpatient endoscopy and might mean that hell need a hospital stay, after all.

In Marias own words, the health insurance industry has enacted its own cash for clunkers program. Only in this case, the so-called clunkers are older Americans being sent to the junkyard. Theres a lot of fault to go around: Medicare stretches its budget to the limit and has bureaucrats making coverage decisions, while for-profit insurers like Humana have CEOs and shareholders that also demand a reduction in costs. The patients themselves–our parents, grandparents, siblings, children, partners, and friends–are lost in the midst this battle, even though they should be the most important factor of all. Some opponents of the public option claim that it will lead to the forced euthanasia of seniors, while others believe those claims are overblown. Nevertheless, indirect euthanasia is already happening right now; this is a case in point. Healthcare reform is a complicated issue, and its deeper than greater availability of affordable health insurance. That wont matter if, after paying premiums and/or taxes for decades, your insurance wont give you the care you need most. I dont claim to know what proposal will work best, but Maria says that the current system is broken and that we urgently need healthcare reform of some kind. Everybody doesnt have a family member to be an advocate, she adds. I worry about how many elderly people fall through the cracks without someone to find the loopholes to work the system for them.

br
br
pYamileth Medina is an up and coming expert on Health Insurance and a target=_new href=http://www.healthinsurancesearch.com/healthcare-reform rel=nofollowHealthcare Reform/a. She aims to help people realize that they can get an affordable health insurance plan right now while waiting for a public option, if it ever gets passed. Yamileth lives in Miami, FL./pbr
br

Author: Individual Health Insurancebr
Source: articlesbase.combr
br
A spokesman for the health-insurance industry yesterday accused congressional Democrats of mounting a fishing expedition as individual insurers considered whether to honor a House committees request for financial records.Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for the American Health Insurance Plans, said Democrats on the panel hoped to silence the health-insurance industry and distract attention away from the fact that the American people are rejecting a government-run plan as part of President Obamas planned overhaul.Zirkelbach said it would be up to individual companies to decide whether to turn over the records.Dozens of insurers, including Hartford, Conn.-based Aetna Inc., Louisville, Ky.-based Humana Inc., and Philadelphia-based Cigna Corp., received the request, part of an investigation by the panel of executive compensation and other business practices inside the industry.A spokesman for Rep. Bart Stupak (D., Mich.) said Tuesday night that 52 letters had been sent to health insurers that have $2 billion or more in annual premiums.He said such letters were not dispatched to other industry groups, some of which have been airing television advertising in support of Obamas call for legislation.Among the records requested are those related to compensation of highly paid employees; documents relating to companies premium income and claims payments, and information on expenses stemming from any event held outside company facilities in the last 2 1/2 years.The requests were made in letters signed by Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D., Calif.) – who guided a portion of health-care legislation through the House Energy and Commerce Committee last month as chairman – and Stupak, who heads a subcommittee.They wrote that the committee was examining executive compensation and other business practices in the health insurance industry.The letter from Waxman and Stupak requested that the information be provided by early September.While the companies are not under legal obligation to comply, the committee could respond to a refusal by voting to subpoena the information.We are reviewing the letter from Chairman Waxman and will respond as appropriate, Chris Curran, a spokesman for Cigna, said in e-mail. Humana spokesman Tom Noland said the company planned to cooperate fully with the panel. An Aetna representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment.Among the documents requested are records relating to compensation paid to any company executive earning more than $500,000 in any year from 2003 to 2008.Waxman and Stupak also sought documents relating to premiums paid by policyholders; claims payments; sales expenses; administrative expenses, and profits, broken down by categories such as employer-provided coverage; individual coverage, Medicare, and Medicaid.The requests were issued at a time when Obamas health-care proposal is under intense attack from Republicans and other critics, including the health-insurance industry. Much of the opposition focuses on proposals for the government to sell insurance in competition with private carriers.Obama and other supporters of a so-called government option argue it would help control costs and keep insurance companies honest by forcing them to grapple with competition.Opponents say it gradually would undermine the present insurance structure, which is built around private insurers, and lead to a system controlled by the government.The issue drew intense focus over the weekend, after Obama speculated aloud about the possibility that a final bill might not require a government role in selling insurance.The White House said there had been no change in position. But liberals expressed dismay, giving rise to increased speculation that Senate Democrats could abandon efforts at bipartisanship and draft legislation tailored to their own rank and file.Any such measure would inevitably jettison many of the compromises crafted in weeks of bipartisan Senate talks. It was unclear whether the talk was a ploy to persuade Senate Republicans to agree to a compromise.br
br
pQuoting and Saving on your health insurance has never been easier…EasyToInsureME

A href=http://easytoinsureme.com/humana.html Humana /A
A href=http://easytoinsureme.com/humana.html Humana health insurance /A

EasyToInsureME offers clients the easiest way to buy individual health insurance. Free services include instant online health insurance quotes, custom proposals for each client, free phone consultations, and 10-minute application by phone. Nobody does what we do for our clients!/pbr
br